When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Heres how it works.
However, that all changed last year when thePhilips HueFestavia hit the scene.
That being said, both brands have been known to produce some pretty extortionately priced devices.
There are three different length options available from Philips Hue, though availability varies across regions.
There are only a handful of marginal differences, and the first one is going to require some maths.
Philips Hue purports the Festavia lights will last 15,000h while Nanoleaf’s only lasts for 10,000h.
That would effectively mean you have up to 20 more years with Hue than you do Nanoleaf.
This is a big win over the Festavia lights which can only be affected by the Philips Hue app.
The Festavia lights are also outdoor-proofed with IP54 waterproofing versus Nanoleaf’s IP44.
Everything from the app to the specs and the customization varies wildly between the two products.
One area where Festavia takes the lead is specs.
Nanoleaf can take a little longer to follow through on instructions, but it’s a pretty small difference.
Connectivity is almost identical between the two, too.
The in-app experience is where things get interesting.
On the one hand, Philips Hue’s app is undoubtedly better than Nanoleaf.
It’s clean, well-organized, intuitive, and just great-looking.
Pairing is incredibly easy, and there’s a handy tutorial specifically for these lights in the app.
Conversely, the Nanoleaf app can be finickity at best.
However, the massive game-changer here is in customizability.
However, it’s also important the lights function as tree decorations, given that’s the main function.
This is where Philips Hue loses a lot of goodwill.
you could choose up to six colors depending on your light setting.
These can also be controlled using the physical switch if you don’t fancy the smart approach.
Each palette can consist of up to seven colors.
Philips Hue Festavia vs Nanoleaf smart holiday string lights: Which one to buy?
You might also like
