When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Heres how it works.
Apple withheld critical access from developers
The lawsuit breaks down into three primary complaints.
On other phones, you might tap to pay with Venmo or PayPal instead ofGoogleWallet.
Merrick Garland, US Attorney general
On the iPhone, every transaction goes through Apple Pay, and Apple takes a big cut.
Additionally, limiting access to the phones hardware means that accessories like smartwatches are not interoperable.
You cannot use the latest Galaxy Watch with the latest Apple iPhone.
Jonathan Kanter, assistant attorney general in charge of the Antitrust Division
Of course this is the iMessage and green bubble argument, taken much further.
Switching will be an ongoing theme in the lawsuit, it seems.
It characterized the DOJs case as meritless and plans to seek immediate dismissal.
This lawsuit threatens who we are and the principles that set Apple products apart in fiercely competitive markets.
It would also set a dangerous precedent, empowering government to take a heavy hand in designing peoples technology.
Apple argues that its smartphone business is a global business and a highly competitive one at that.
Apple characterizes its business as, if not open, certainly not prescriptive.
Apple was keen to point out all the benefits the market and developers enjoy because of its approach.
It claims a massive 374% growth in payments to app developers between 2014 and 2023.
Apple also says iOS apps generate 85% more income than Android apps.
Apples approach is rooted in providing thebest iPhonecustomer experience and a strict adherence to privacy and security principles.
Apple maintains that a “high cost of switching” doesn’t even exist.
